Killing 2 birds with 1 stone is considered a mark of manipulative intelligence among the Elite. The Controllers like to create reactions that benefit their goals. It should be noted in terms of politics often times a consensus is reached before an action is taken. This consensus may be reached among themselves or themselves and outside political players. In the latter case the appearance of killing 2 birds is simply that different parties were granted different goals from the same event as selling points.

An example is the World Trade Center attacks in 2001. One of the biggest things going on in the news at the time were the World Trade Protests. Workers the world over were realizing they would be losing job and wage protection from competing workers in underdeveloped nations. The job losses in the US automotive industry, sent to Mexico by manufacturers, was the impetus. The “victim” of the 9/11 attacks was symbolically World Trade. Then there’s this little bit about $2.3 Trillion missing from the Pentagon on 9/10/2001. Ironic they made Rumsfeld go along with the invasion of Iraq.

Not all of the Elite got what they wanted. The Patriot Act, allowing under the declared emergency the ability for government agencies to monitor and apprehend people without following due process was a bird. The resulting war, always a major distraction, took the steam out of the World Trade Protests, another bird. War, and the fear it creates, benefits the leaders of a society in that critics become more easily painted as unpatriotic; bird. Killing the lesser members of their ilk under the cover of a war to maintain control is also a bird. The normalization of a surveillance society is also a bird. What they did not get was a way to round up undesirables.

So 9/11 afforded a lot more than 2 birds. Of course with propaganda; they can always blame it on the Jews, whose writing they fear.