Redacted?

The first round of Epstein Files was released today, and some people aren’t happy . “Thomas Massey (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA) who co-wrote Epstein Transparency Act say releasing heavily redacted files on rolling basis does not comply with law.” (The Guardian)

Heavily redacted? The only excuse the FBI, who had this leverage on their desks, can use to redact anything is the old “threat to national security” clause. There is absolutely nothing anyone should have been saying to Jeffrey Epstein having anything to do with national security. To speak to Epstein about classified information is an impeachable offense.

The only threat to national security are the boxes of classified papers in Mar a Lago and a bunch of compromised politicians with access to sensitive information. Let’s force the spooks to give us the real and complete information.

  • Latest Epstein files release ‘grossly fails to comply with both the spirit and letter of the law’, says congressman – live The Guardian
  • Trump returns seized classified documents to Mar-a-Lago aboard Air Force One UPI