The Ugly Truth..

… about cultural engineering. In an article entitled 5 Ugly Abraham Lincoln Facts No One Likes to Talk About (YEntertainment) some quotes are presented via the Smithsonian to make the case Abraham Lincoln was not an abolitionist.

“If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.”

The Union Generals of the Civil War had varying opinions on slavery. Ulysses S Grant owned slaves at the start of the war. He later became an ardent abolitionist. This is also true of General George H Thomas. General William Birney believed in emancipation and encouraged black men to join the Union Army. Many US Generals, like Robert E Lee, and troops aligned themselves with the Confederacy. Obviously Lincoln had to walk a fine line to keep his Generals and armies on the side of the North.

Some fail to recognize Abraham Lincoln’s leadership and ability to actually fight the war. The North could have just let the Confederate States secede. The Union would have been broken and slavery would have continued.

“Your race are suffering, in my judgment, the greatest wrong inflicted on any people,” he said. “But even when you cease to be slaves, you are yet far removed from being placed on an equality with the white race.”

History bears witness to this prophetic statement by Lincoln. He was right; after slavery was abolished the sabotage of Reconstruction and creation of Jim Crow laws ensured blacks would not have equal rights for a century.

This effort to take Abraham Lincoln down a notch fits in nicely with the effort to remove DEI from the military and government services (NPR). It’s the flipside of teaching kids in Florida that slavery was good for black people (NBCNews). It’s the ugly truth about some of our nation’s academia.


Oddly enough some of these same professors would label Karl Marx a humanitarian and egalitarian.

“The Jewish nigger Lassalle who, I’m glad to say, is leaving at the end of this week, has happily lost another 5,000 talers in an ill-judged speculation. The chap would sooner throw money down the drain than lend it to a ‘friend,’ even though his interest and capital were guaranteed. … It is now quite plain to me—as the shape of his head and the way his hair grows also testify—that he is descended from the negroes who accompanied Moses’ flight from Egypt (unless his mother or paternal grandmother interbred with a nigger). Now, this blend of Jewishness and Germanness, on the one hand, and basic negroid stock, on the other, must inevitably give rise to a peculiar product. The fellow’s importunity is also nigger-like.” Karl Marx, “Marx to Friedrich Engels in Manchester,” 1862

“Indian society has no history at all, at least no known history. What we shall call its history is but the history of the successive invaders who founded their empires on the passive basis of that unresisting and unchanging society.” Karl Marx, New York Daily Tribune, August 8, 1853

“Russia is a name usurped by the Muscovites. They are not Slavs, do not belong at all to the Indo-German race, but are des intrus [intruders], who must again he hurled back beyond the Dnieper, etc.” Karl Marx, letter to Friedrich Engels, June 24, 1865

“What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. … Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man—and turns them into commodities. … The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange. … The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general.Karl Marx, “On the Jewish Question,” 1844

Interestingly Karl Marx made overtures to Lincoln, writing letters and attempting to befriend the US president. It was one of the man god Marx’s operatives that assassinated Lincoln.

Related; A Critique of the New Revisionist Historians 4dforum.org