Comparing Cortes And Khomeini

The strategies used to affect the conquest of the Aztec Empire by Hernan Cortes and install the Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran and are essentially the same. It follows the strategies were directed by the same Controllers in different lifetimes.

A Controller living in Europe or the colony of Hispanola, probably a priest, was traveling out of body to visit Montezuma. The latter would pierce his foreskin with a porcupine quill to call his “god” to him. Montezuma’s Controller likes foreskins. Montezuma was directed to conduct mass sacrifices and certainly the souls were harvested and picked through.

Cortes showed up in the exact year the Aztecs expected the return of Quetzalcoatl. Not such an amazing coincidence considering his and Montezuma’s Controllers were buddies. They didn’t think Cortes was a god because of his horses, guns or the color of his skin. They thought this because of the size and energy of his Controller.

Montuzuma had been sacrificing the children of conquered tribes to his Controller. The tribes sided with Cortes and helped him (and his 200 men) defeat the Aztecs, as planned. In the end they also lost their lands and populations to the “New Boss.”

For a comparison The Shah of Iran was deemed to be insane by certain US officials. He had cracked down on dissidence in the liberal nation in a harsh manner. This created a backlash. The backlash was exploited by the Allah of Aramco and his boy Ruhollah Khomeini. Khomeini was in exile in France. The French and the Carter Administration were conned into allowing him to return to Iran. He took over and created the first Shia Theocracy of modern times. Iran provides money and weapons to anti Saudi, anti US and anti Israeli terrorist organizations.

Bereshit 12: 10-11; (To Abraham) This is my covenant, which you shall keep, between me and you and your seed. After you the word is all to you male. And ye have circumcised the flesh of your foreskin, and it is a sign of the covenant, between me and you.