!!Common Threads

Common threads in history occur because people repeat themselves lifetime after lifetime. They do the same or similar things when presented with the same circumstances. The repeat performances of powerful people cause history itself to repeat. Because most of history has been recorded through lies, when it is seen another time and lied about again (same victors) it is recorded the same. When the victors are not the same the story appears different. When those affected are not the same person their reaction can also cause the story to vary.

It is doubtful that Lot in the story of Soddom (Genesis 18=19) is the same as the man from Judges 19 – 21. But, the same controllers are playing god. This creates some similarities in the story. Today men sent by Fromm to the city of his enemies to set up the town by raping people and claiming they are from the target town help us understand the two biblical stories. Siddim and Soddom were probably the same place. The name is presented differently because Abraham was defeated in battle against Siddim. He plays off his involvement In the trickery to make the place look evil by feigning a conversation with the Lord requesting the towns be spared (Bereshis 18:23-33). Since the Lord (possibly his buddy the Pharaoh or Moloch) is going to make a world ruled by Abraham, the latter must seem not to be involved.

When we search for Abraham in history we can use common threads and clues. In Bereshit 22:17, Abraham is told that for sacrificing his son he will be rewarded. His seeds will become as numerous as the sands of all the seas. It is the same thing Adam is told when he and Eve are kicked out of the garden. Abraham is Adam reincarnated and he killed his son Abel through Cain, or perhaps Cain took the blame through loyalty.


That I will surely bless you, and I will greatly multiply your seed as the stars of the heavens and as the sand that is on the seashore, and your descendants will inherit the cities of their enemies. יזכִּֽי־בָרֵ֣ךְ אֲבָֽרֶכְךָ֗ וְהַרְבָּ֨ה אַרְבֶּ֤ה אֶת־זַרְעֲךָ֙ כְּכֽוֹכְבֵ֣י הַשָּׁמַ֔יִם וְכַח֕וֹל אֲשֶׁ֖ר עַל־שְׂפַ֣ת הַיָּ֑ם וְיִרַ֣שׁ זַרְעֲךָ֔ אֵ֖ת שַׁ֥עַר אֹֽיְבָֽיו:
And through your children shall be blessed all the nations of the world, because you hearkened to My voice.”
See Related posts below

It is fairly apparent that Abraham, the real Adam has a thing for killing his son. Versions of the story vary, older ones largely destroyed tell the story that Abraham did kill Isaac, sacrificing him to “the Lord.” In John 8:44 Jesus refers to Abraham saying, “The father of the Jews is the Father of Lies…”. This has been rewritten in most versions. The excuse for the rewrite is it may be used to justify anti-semitism. The irony here is that the anti-semitism is the advent of “Abraham” in future lifetimes anyway.

If we follow along with our infanticide model, Adam is Abraham. Kronos killed his children but his son Zeus killed him. Then, for some strange reason, Zeus kills his sons. Either Zeus decided to sacrifice to Moloch or Kronos took Zeus’ place. The latter possibility infers a failure of Zeus to kill Kronos or they were switched during reincarnations.

Emperor Constantine, the founder of Christianity in Rome (Catholic and Orthodox Churches) killed his son. The story varies, some versions blame his second wife. The official records of the events were expunged.

Karl Marx‘s sons died under suspicious circumstances. Reportedly it was neglect, they died of malnutrition.

This is were the aforementioned irony comes into play. Constantine and Marx were ardent anti-semites. Abraham was trying to erase the history of his repeated infanticide. The idea touted by the Catholic Church that god gave his son as a sacrifice to save mankind is to play off infanticide. Deicide, a contradiction to the sacrifice, is a claim by the church that was predictably blamed on the Jews. Could Abraham have been Pilate? His cohorts having been inserted into the Jewish state as the Pharisee and Herod?

If we examine the Abrahamic religions we see a progression. There is the Catholic idea of destroying Judaeism. There is also the destruction of pre-Catholic Christian texts by the Mycean Council’s order. Those are the ones not included in their bible. There is the Muslim idea of destroying Christianity and Judaeism. We could insert into this story the efforts of Pilate and later Nero to destroy Judaeism. If we want to have even more fun we could take the line from Bereshit 22:18 and consider the repeated sacking of Rome by different European tribes. Each case Abraham’s children are attempting to erase his past.

That leads us to Karl Marx. Socialism and Communism seek to replace religion with psychology. The new psychology will be filled with the same amount of dogma and lies as the religions it seeks to replace. This will give Abraham and the other Roman gods continued control over people’s minds. The benefit for them is the destruction of their history of ruling mankind (Huffington Post). We might examine the current plight (New York Times) of the Yazidis and Zoroastrianism. Karl Marx was Friedrich Fromm, not Erwin Rommel.

Related Posts